October 28, 2008 by Chinatown Blogger.

As reported in the Boston Globe this morning, State Senator Wilkerson, who represents Chinatown as part of her district, was arrested by the FBI after an 18-month investigation on bribery charges. If the charges stick, this would definitely mean the end of Wilkerson’s political career.

———————–
Boston Globe

Embattled state senator arrested by FBI
October 28, 2008 08:58 AM
By John R. Ellement, Donovan Slack, Shelley Murphy, and Andrew Ryan, Globe Staff

State Senator Dianne Wilkerson was arrested this morning after an 18-month undercover FBI investigation in which she allegedly accepted eight bribes worth $23,500.

The 15-year lawmaker allegedly accepted cash payoffs that ranged from $500 to $10,000 to help a nightclub secure a liquor license and to assist a private developer who wanted to build on state land. The investigation includes audio and video recordings and still photographs of Wilkerson allegedly accepting cash payoffs starting in June 2007 and continuing through this month.

One series of photographs displayed by federal authorities at a press conference this morning show Wilkerson allegedly stuffing a $1,000 payoff into her bra during a meeting with an informant at No. 9 Park restaurant, which was surreptitiously recorded with audio and video. The 10, $100 bills were not in an envelope and clearly visible in the photograph dated June 18, 2007.

According to a 32-page affidavit, Wilkerson also brought along a grandchild when she accept a $1,000 kickback on Aug. 31, 2007, at the Fill-A-Buster restaurant, which is directly across the street from the State House.

“Public service is a privilege. Voters and taxpayers expect that elected officials will do what is right for their constituents, not what is financially best for themselves,” US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan said this morning at the press conference. “Citizens place extraordinary trust in those it gives the greatest authority. And with that authority comes the obligation to act with fairness and honesty.”

Wilkerson is expected to be arraigned this afternoon in US District Court in Boston. She faces up to 40 years in prison if convicted with more potential charges pending.

Wilkerson’s campaign manager Boyce Slayman confirmed that Wilkerson was led away in handcuffs.

“I’m with her now at the headquarters,” Slayman said, apparently referring to police headquarters.

Wilkerson has represented Roxbury for more than a decade, but lost the Democratic primary to Sonia Chang-Diaz earlier this month. Wilkerson has been mounting a sticker campaign to regain her seat in the November election.

Wilkerson is also facing the loss of her license to practice law. The Board of Bar Overseers has alleged she lied under oath at a 2005 Suffolk Superior Court hearing, an allegation she has denied.

The charges, which were unsealed this morning in a 32-page affidavit, contend that Wilkerson accepted $23,500 bribes in exchange for, among other things, helping the nightclub Deja Vu get a liquor license.

After accepting an initial $500 bribe on June 5, 2007, Wilkerson allegedly telephoned Mayor Thomas M. Menino on June 17, 2007, to lobby on behalf of the nightclub in a call that was recorded by the FBI. Wilkerson told an informant later that day that she had “talked to the mayor” and his office would help obtain a nontransferable license to sell beer and wine until a full liquor license “freed up.”

http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2008/10/embattled_state.html

Posted in WORD ON THE STREET | Print | No Comments »

October 27, 2008 by Chinatown Blogger.

Good moves on Greenway
By Yvonne Abraham
Globe Columnist / October 19, 2008

If you want to see how great the Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway can and should be, head down to Chinatown any day of the week.

There, at the edge of the new park just outside the Chinatown Gate, you will find a bunch of guys sitting at dinky tables playing Chinese chess.

This is usually a two-man game, but it takes at least eight to play it in Chinatown: two to move the pieces around, and six to sit around barking advice at them in Cantonese.

At one table on a recent morning, a gray-haired man faced a Boston cop. They stared at the board, slowly sliding around the white disks labeled with red and green characters. Other men chain-smoked Shuangxi cigarettes, jiggled their legs, and watched.

“Why are you afraid of the cannon?” one spectator demanded of the older man. “One move, you can kill the general.”

“Kill that one, you should kill that one,” offered another.

The elderly man ignored them. He moved his piece. The cop cornered him.

“We told you so!” the men said, according to an interpreter.

This gang of enthusiasts - mostly retired men and restaurant workers between shifts - started out in the Maxim bakery on Harrison Avenue a few years ago. But the groups that gathered to watch the games got so big they had to move onto the street outside the Sovereign Bank. And then they decamped to the Chinatown Gate Park, at the end of Beach Street.

About a year ago, the games moved to a nook at the very tip of the new Greenway - 27 acres of public space where the elevated expressway used to be.

The groups are cramped in their little corner. One of the tables sits in the dirt under a tree. A few feet away is a handsome paved plaza with sculptures and a fountain and bamboo garden. They could spread out there, but there’s no shade. And they don’t want to get in other people’s way.

A more comfortable set-up would be useful, though.

“No question, it would be much better if we had a permanent place to play,” said one of the spectators on Thursday morning. A custodian at a downtown courthouse, he didn’t want his name used, lest his wife find out he’d been watching chess all morning.

Here, at the very end of the Greenway, is the promise of the Big Dig fulfilled. The point of that enormously expensive feat was to knit the city together, and to turn the freed-up space into places where neighborhoods could expand and the whole city could visit.

So far, the Greenway mostly has fallen short of those ideals. It needs cafes and museums, though in this economic climate, it’s not likely that the various cultural centers proposed will be built anytime soon. It needs more - and edgier - public art. The Interstate 93 ramp insisted upon by the downtown community, and the busy cross-streets that carve the Greenway up make it feel like a fancy traffic island in places.

But the trees will grow. It could take years, but the city’s newest public space will fill out. The Greenway will get there.

There is plenty that is great about it already: locals lolling about in the beautiful North End parks; the sopping kids squealing in the flirty, on-and-off fountain between Milk and State streets in summer; the sky and the sunshine where there was none.

And the Chinatown chess men. They achieved something no amount of money or painstaking planning ever could: they have given the place a personality.

Nancy Brennan, executive director of the Greenway Conservancy, knows the immense value of that. She wants to provide better furniture and shade for the chess players so they can move out into the plaza if they want.

For now, the players stack their little tables against a fence every night, and every morning they’re still there. And it looks like the men and their mismatched chairs have been here forever.

Yvonne Abraham is a Globe columnist. Her e-mail address isAbraham@globe.com

Posted in WORD ON THE STREET | Print | No Comments »

October 24, 2008 by Chinatown Blogger.

This one-day conference offers three innovative personal and leadership development workshops, a community round-table, and a film screening.  Designed by and for Asian Americans, these workshops will teach participants to leverage their leadership skills and lead community action in the Asian American community and beyond. Come out, learn new skills, and meet other active community members, students, and professionals who are leaders in the community!

WHEN:
The Alumni Center
Northeastern University
716 Columbus Ave
Boston, MA 02120

WHERE:
October, June 25, 2008
9:00 am to 5:00 pm

COST:
Early Registration: $10 student / $25 non-profit / $40 general
(includes breakfast, lunch and materials)
Walk In Registration: $15 student /  $30 non-profit / $50 general
Registration is still open, and early registration is recommended!

REGISTER HERE: http://leap.org/empower_conference_boston.html

QUESTIONS? Please contact Albert Chiang at achiang@leap.org.

Albert Chiang
Program Coordinator
Leadership Education for Asian Pacifics, Inc. (LEAP)
achiang@leap.org
(213) 485-1422 x4107
(213) 485-0050 (fax)
www.leap.org

Posted in CHINATOWN CALENDAR | Print | No Comments »

October 13, 2008 by Chinatown Blogger.

UPDATE: 10/17/08
Since this blog was posted on Oct 13th, the Boston Redevelopment Authority changed their minds at the last minute and decided not to push for the Planned Development Area (PDA) zoning amendments for Chinatown at their Board meeting on Oct. 16. This may be partly due to community criticism about how the process was handled. The second piece, the PDA designation was approved at the BRA Board meeting for the Parcel 24 development. The Parcel 24 PDA designation was not an issue because the community had been informed a month before hand that the developers were applying for a PDA designation rather than a zoning variance. However, even though the BRA has backed off from the zoning amendments, this does not mean the BRA may not come back again. (Also made some edits to previous blog.)

You may have missed the announcement. You may not even care. Manny (sic) may not even know but the Boston Redevelopment Authority is trying to sneak in a fastball.

On Tuesday, October 14th, the BRA is hosting a public hearing on Proposed Zoning Changes to the Chinatown District. The purpose of the meeting is to amend the text of Article 43, the law that regulates zoning in Chinatown. Article 43 stipulates that zoning in Chinatown is limited to 100 feet unless the area is designated as a Planned Development Area (PDA). PDAs are zoning designations used by the City to give developers exemptions on height restrictions if certain requirements are met. Some of these requirements can be in the form of community benefits. The logic being: if a developer is allowed to build above and beyond the legal zoning limit, the developer should contribute a percentage of the profits as benefits back to the community that is being affected.

There are currently several PDAs in the Chinatown neighborhood: the Residential Chinatown PDA, Chinatown Gateway PDA, Turnpike Air Rights PDA, and PDA IV, the Hinge Block/Kensington development. The Residential Chinatown PDA includes Parcel A on Marginal Rd/Washington St, the site where Josiah Quincy Upper School is located, and includes the Oak Terrace development. The BRA’s primary purpose for hosting the Oct 14th meeting is because the proposed Parcel 24 development on Hudson Street and Kneeland Street is applying for a PDA designation.

Former LA Dodger Kirk Gibson once recounted after his historic home run in the 1988 World Series that he knew the Oakland A’s closer Dennis Eckersley would throw a backdoor slider with the count 3-2, “Dodger scout Mel Didier had provided a report on Eckersley that claimed with a 3-2 count against a left-handed hitter, one could be absolutely certain that Eckersley would throw a backdoor slider.”

So why does the Chinatown Blogger think the BRA is throwing a fastball this time around? While the purpoes of the meeting is for Parcel 24 to apply for a PDA, the BRA also inserted language near the bottom of the amendment that would change the area’s zoning requirements. This is a typical hit and run play by the BRA. As any developer knows, proposing to build in Chinatown beyond the zoning limit requires zoning strategy. Typically, the developer would ask for a zoning variance from the BRA. For Parcel 24, this would have been the case, except, as some community members have raised in public hearings, “that Parcel 24 LLC in the eleventh-hour requested a PDA.” So why a PDA and not a zoning variance?

Questions to he developers for Parcel 24 and the BRA were not answered satisfactory beyond the canned messages that the development needed a “zoning strategy.” The developers even said at a public meeting that, “The PDA would codify the program usage of the site from the affordable housing numbers down to where the trees are.” In fact, the developers argued, a PDA designation would be more “restrictive.” This argument is counter-intuitive because most developers want less restrictions, not more restrictions. Why is the developer applying for a zoning designation that gives them less flexibility?

The 2nd red flag was raised when the BRA suddenly announced on October 7th that a public hearing will be held to discuss zoning changes to Chinatown in a week on Oct. 14th. Zoning changes to a neighborhood? Wouldn’t that qualify as a major issue that maybe, maybe, the community should have been given more notice in advance? Was there intent there?

Before we go on about the amendment changes, let’s understand let’s summarize what currently exists on Article 43, the zoning law for the Chinatown neighborhood. Article 43 Section 16.1 states that the BRA may approve developments that are 50% reserved for residential use and includes 50% affordable units on site or a similar number off-site in Chinatown, and a minimum ratio of .07 parking space per housing unit. Developers that want to build on the Residential Chinatown PDA site must meet these requirements.

What the BRA is proposing to amend is to create a Type I and Type II PDA. Type I is unchanged from the original in Articl 43, which specifies a height of 175′ and Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 6. Type II is intended for the Parcel 24 development and specifies 230′/7. The Parcel 24 development is roughly 225 feet in height. The parking ratio was also changed from .07 to .05. Nothing new here that the community didn’t know.

Next, the BRA then proposes to amend the criteria for approval of developments applying for the PDA designation:

“or a lesser percentage as determined through the Article 80 Large Project Review Process.”

What does this mean? Currently, the BRA will approve only projects that meets the 50% affordable housing requirement in exchange for height and FAR exemptions through a PDA designation. However, with the new text amendments, developers in the future may choose NOT to meet the 50% affordability requirement and apply for a zoning variance and “offer a lower percentage as determined through the Article 80 Large Project Review Process.”

The BRA is hosting the meeting on October 14th to request a PDA designation for Parcel 24. However, the BRA is also trying to sneak a fastball in, hoping that no one is looking. The community shouldn’t let this fastball go by.

Posted in WORD ON THE STREET | Print | No Comments »

October 13, 2008 by Chinatown Blogger.

http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2008/10/11/super_88_shifts_course_as_competition_mounts/

By Christina Pazzanese Globe Correspondent / October 11, 2008

Super 88 shifts course as competition mounts
Asian market chain to shut 3 stores, renovate others

Facing heightened competition from other Asian grocers, Super 88 Market has quietly shuttered half of the chain’s six Boston-area stores and reduced the number of products it carries.

In the past month, the Boston-based Asian food grocery chain, which specializes in Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Korean, Thai, and other Southeast Asian goods, closed three small stores, in Quincy, the South End, and its original location in Chinatown, which opened in 1978. The stores performed below expectations and were too costly to justify their existence, said Glenn Frank, general counsel for Super 88 owners Peter and George Luu. Some workers have been reassigned while others were laid off, though he declined to provide specific figures.

Frank said the company will now refocus the business on its larger, remaining stores, in Allston, Dorchester, and Malden - which are all 20,000 square feet or larger. In the next two to three months, Super 88 will add new shelving and freezer and refrigeration systems and expand the food court areas. The company will also narrow the selection of products it carries while beefing up quantities of certain products.

“Super 88 is not only not going anywhere, we’re thriving,” Frank said. “We’re investing a lot of time and energy into making the other stores better.”

For years, Super 88 dominated the market, filling a niche for the fast-growing demand for Asian foods. Between 1990 and 2000, the number of Asian-Americans in Massachusetts soared 68 percent, according to the US Census Bureau. This population’s considerable buying power and loyalty to shops providing fresh produce and seafood soon made rival grocers jump into the market. At the same time, supermarket chains like Stop & Shop and Shaw’s expanded their ethnic food offerings.

The competition intensified in recent years, with rivals C Mart Supermarket opening near Chinatown and Kam Man Foods debuting in Quincy. This year, H Mart, a national chain specializing in Asian foods, unveiled plans to open a 51,000-square-foot store in Burlington.

“The fact is Asian-Americans are the fastest growing racial group in the state,” said Paul Watanabe, director of the Institute for Asian American Studies at the University of Massachusetts at Boston.

Super 88’s downsizing will likely allow the remaining stores to better compete against niche and national grocery chains. Large stores give retailers a chance to showcase a wider assortment of products and in greater quantities, ideally luring a broader customer base and keeping customers from feeling they need to visit other merchants, said David Orgel, editor in chief of Supermarket News, a weekly trade magazine.

Large stores “would be more of a destination and you can really show the range of what you can do,” Watanabe said. “Trying to do that in a small store is a challenge.”

These days, empty shelves and freezer cases are evident in Super 88’s large Allston and Dorchester stores. This week, the handful of shoppers in Dorchester barely seemed to notice that the store’s bakery and hot, prepared food display were barren and unstaffed. A sign marked “eggs” offered none below, while a tank advertising live rock crabs held only a few.

Dorchester store manager Ken Hong, said there had been some difficulty getting products from suppliers in recent weeks, but the backlog has been resolved and new stock is rolling in.

In Allston, workers painted the exterior, while inside a small group of employees put away batches of canned goods. But many freezer cases were empty with signs promising future renovations. The store appeared quiet, with only one checkout lane open around lunchtime, a stark comparison to the bustling food court down the hall.

Geoff Modest, a regular customer at the Dorchester store, said he has been worried about the store’s fate - and even asked employees yesterday what was going on because on several occasions recently the store ran out of a brand of hoisin sauce he liked as well as certain rice paper.

“When they started to get rid of housewares, I was getting concerned,” said Modest, adding that he thought it was great the larger stores are getting an upgrade.

In addition to the reorganization, Super 88 in June was ordered to pay $200,000 in restitution and fines after Attorney General Martha Coakley’s office said the company had violated the state’s wage and hour laws, failing to pay more than 300 workers at all six stores the minimum wage, overtime, Sunday, and holiday pay during early 2007.

The company is paying the sum in installments, said Harry Pierre, a spokesman for the attorney general.

© Copyright 2008 Globe Newspaper Company.

Posted in WORD ON THE STREET | Print | No Comments »